Legal Opinion

Booth v. Wiley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2005No. 02S03-0402-CV-95PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiffs, L. Thomas Booth and Norma Sue Booth, husband and wife, appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Robert G. Wiley, M.D., Ronald K. Norlund, O.D., and Midwest Eye Consultants, P.C., d/b/a Cataract & Laser Institute (collectively, "the defendants"). The Court of Appeals reversed. Booth v. Wiley, 798 N.E.2d 1104 (Ind.Ct. App.2003). We granted transfer and now reverse the summary judgment and remand the case to the trial court.

In their appeal, the plaintiffs contend that, because the evidence shows that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Guinn v. LightIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. National City Bank v. ILLINOIS PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BD.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mary Alice Manley, and Gary Manley v. Ryan J. Sherer, M.D., and Sherer Family Medicine, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Rathje v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. Herron v. AnigboIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Overton v. GrilloIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Theresa Biedron v. Anonymous Physician 1Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API