Legal Opinion

Degussa Corp. v. Mullens

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2001No. 49S05-9812-CV-763PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Lenita Mullens filed a complaint against Defendants for negligently exposing her to products which allegedly caused her to suffer permanent lung damage. Defendants moved for summary judgment asserting that Mullens filed her complaint after the expiration of the two-year statute of limitations for her products liability claim. Finding that Mullens filed a timely claim, we affirm the trial court's denial of *409Defendants' summary judgment motion. Defendant Agritek filed a separate motion to dismiss, asserting that the Indiana Worker's Compensation Act '…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Moberly v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brin v. S.E.W. InvestorsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Lisa D. Nelson and David A. Nelson v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Wishard Memorial Hospital v. KerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API