Legal Opinion
Dorman v. Osmose, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2003No. 53A05-0206-CV-284PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Mark Dorman ("Dorman") and Tracy Dorman (collectively, "the Dormans") appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Osmose, Inc. ("Os-mose"), Walker-Williams Lumber Company ("Walker-Williams"), and Bender Lumber Company ("Bender") on their product liability and negligence claims. The Dor-mans present several issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred when it found that the Dormang' claims are time-barred as a matter of law.
We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Schrader v. Eli Lilly and Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Zawistoski v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Irwin Mortgage Corp. v. Marion County TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Morgan v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Dorman v. Osmose, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- DuRocher v. Riddell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- Benjamin Crossing Homeowners' Ass'n v. HeideIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.