Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2005No. 89A05-0505-CV-270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellants-plaintiffs Keith A. Morgan (Morgan) and Tricia L. Morgan appeal the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee-plaintiff Horner Electric, Inc.1 Specifically, the Morgans assert that the trial court erred in finding that the statute of limitations had run on the Morgans' claim against Horner alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Finding that Morgan's symptoms were of a kind that would cause a person of reasonable diligence to take action that would lead to the discovery of his cause of action, we affirm the judgment of the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Degussa Corp. v. MullensIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Herschel W. Peterson and First Midwest Bank, as Executors of the Estate of David Peterson v. Sealed Air CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 73 v. City of Evansville, IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Johnson v. GuptaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. DuRocher v. Riddell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
  3. Hall v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  4. Martinez v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Morgan v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API