Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Yacob

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1993No. OSB 89-34, 90-61, 90-65, 91-4, 92-36; SC S39964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case, the accused admits seven violations of disciplinary rules or statutes but contends that those violations were not intentional or willful. The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charges additional violations that the accused denies. He also contests the severity of the sanction recommended, urging that extenuating circumstances justify a less severe sanction than the two-year suspension assessed by the trial panel. The Bar requests that, “at a minimum,” a two-year suspension from practice be imposed and asserts that disbarment would “not be inappropriate” in this matter.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WyllieOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BaloccaOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re NisleyOregon Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API