Legal Opinion
In Re Gastineau
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1993No. OSB 89-35, 89-39, 89-82, 89-83, 90-76, 90-77, 90-126, 91-37; SC S39713PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, the accused is charged with collecting excessive fees, Disciplinary Rule (DR) 2-106(A); with incompetent or neglectful representation, DR 6-10KA) and DR 6-101(B); and with failure to carry out a contract of employment, DR 7-101(A)(2). The accused also is charged with failing to respond in a timely manner to the Oregon State Bar’s requests for information concerning complaints made to the Bar by two of his former clients, DR 1-103(0.
On appeal, the accused contests the trial panel’s findings that he charged or collected excessive fees in five instances. He also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SpiesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.