Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gatti
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 2000No. OSB 95-18; SC S45801PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) seeks review of a decision by a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board. ORS 9.536(1); Bar Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.1 and BR 10.3. The Bar charged the accused with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), DR 7-102(A)(5) (knowingly making false statement of law or fact), and ORS 9.527(4) (willful deceit or misconduct in the legal profession). The accused defended, in part, on the theory that there are or should be exceptions…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- United States v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.