Legal Opinion

Daly v. Exxon Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1997No. B093106PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Here we promote the laudatory legislative goal of providing a safe workplace for employees. An employee who makes a bona fide complaint about working conditions or work practices should suffer no adverse employment consequences.

Paula J. Daly appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to her fourth amended complaint for wrongful termination. The trial court ruled that Daly did not state a cause of action arising out of her employer’s decision not to renew a one-year employment contract. We reverse and hold that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hentzel v. Singer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Ford Dealers Assn. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Freund v. Nycomed AmershamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Johnson v. Trustees of Durham Technical Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Kelley v. The Conco Cos.California Court of Appeal · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API