Daly v. Exxon Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Here we promote the laudatory legislative goal of providing a safe workplace for employees. An employee who makes a bona fide complaint about working conditions or work practices should suffer no adverse employment consequences.
Paula J. Daly appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to her fourth amended complaint for wrongful termination. The trial court ruled that Daly did not state a cause of action arising out of her employer’s decision not to renew a one-year employment contract. We reverse and hold that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Hentzel v. Singer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ford Dealers Assn. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Freund v. Nycomed AmershamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Johnson v. Trustees of Durham Technical Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Kelley v. The Conco Cos.California Court of Appeal · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.