Legal Opinion

Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1996No. A071127PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 Cal.App.4th 1200 (1996)

51 Cal. Rptr.2d 328

MARK TERRANCE BARTON, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. A071127.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 26, 1996.

COUNSEL

Mark Terrance Barton, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Steinhart & Falconer, Robert T. Fries and Tamara Mason-Williams for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

STRANKMAN, P.J.

We hold in this case that the statute of limitations for an action for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy is the one-year period provided by Code of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Freund v. Nycomed AmershamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API