Legal Opinion
Freund v. Nycomed Amersham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 2003No. Nos. 01-56491, 01-56494PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge GOULD.
ORDER
Judges Canby and Berzon have voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing in part and to deny it in part. Judge Gould has voted to grant the petition. The petition of Nycomed for panel rehearing is granted in part and denied in part. The majority and dissenting opinions filed in *756this case on April 22, 2003, and reported at 326 F.3d 1070, 1082, are withdrawn and the attached majority and dissenting opinions are ordered filed herewith.
Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for en banc rehearing, and Judge Canby so recommends., Judge…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Go Daddy Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- James D. Wallace v. City of San Diego City of San Diego Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hoffman v. TonnemacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.