Legal Opinion

Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2007No. G036522PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

This case forcefully demonstrates the wisdom and significance of the doctrine of implied findings. Under the doctrine of implied findings, the reviewing court must infer, following a bench trial, that the trial court impliedly made every factual finding necessary to support its decision. Securing a statement of decision is the first step in avoiding the doctrine of implied findings, but is not always enough: The appellant also must bring ambiguities and omissions in the factual findings of the statement of decision to the trial court’s attention. If the appellant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Thompson v. AsimosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API