Blank v. Kirwan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We must decide whether efforts to influence municipal action that are intended to and actually do produce anticompetitive effects are violative of the Cartwright Act when both private individuals and public officials participate. We conclude the act does not apply and hence the judgment must be affirmed.
I
The factual background and procedural history of this action are somewhat complicated. On June 29, 1978, the city council of defendant City of Bell enacted Ordinance No. 806, which legalized the operation of poker clubs in the city and established a structure of regulation. In…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,263 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
1,258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.