Legal Opinion
Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1998No. H017364PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
After the demurrer of defendants Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. (Browning-Ferris) and Lynne Ashcraft (Ashcraft) to plaintiff Lupe Cabesuela’s first amended complaint was sustained, plaintiff’s action against defendants was dismissed. Plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment on the grounds that the court erred in sustaining defendants’ demurrer. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgment.
Procedural Background
On March 26, 1996, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging 1) wrongful termination in violation of public policy, 2) wrongful termination in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Freund v. Nycomed AmershamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Shoyoye v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Herrera v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Light v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.