Legal Opinion

Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1980No. L.A. 31100PublishedCited by 634 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Plaintiff Gordon Tameny instituted the present action against his former employer, Atlantic Richfield Company (Arco),1 alleging that Arco had discharged him after 15 years of service because he refused to participate in an illegal scheme to fix retail gasoline prices. Plaintiff sought recovery from Arco on a number of theories, contending, inter alia, that Arco’s conduct in discharging him for refusing to commit a criminal act was tortious and subjected the employer to liability for compensatory and punitive damages under normal tort principles.

Arco demurred to the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by634 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984

629 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API