Legal Opinion

Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. Sladky

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1904No. S.F. No. 2468PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County granting a new trial. Lucas P. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Charles Sladky from an order of the superior court granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The action was in un lawful detainer, the complaint alleging that Sladky, as assignee of a leasehold interest in plaintiff’s land, and defendant Baton, claiming to have some rights under the lease, were unlawfully holding over and continuing in possession of said land after certain alleged violations of the covenants and conditions of said lease, and after notice in writing requiring them to quit and deliver up to plaintiff possession of the demised premises.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newman v. Overland Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Steinback v. KroneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Martel v. MeehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. People v. PeraltaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Weisser v. Southern Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API