Legal Opinion

People v. Peralta

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from tbe Court of Sessions of Contra Costa County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heydeneeldt

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

Mr. Cb, J. Murray concurred.

Upon tbe trial below, one of tbe jurors, on examination as to bis competency, answered tbat be considered bimself a resident of Sbasta County, although be bad been living in Contra Costa (tbe county of tbe trial) for tbe past five weeks. He was sworn, notwithstanding tbe objection of tbe defendants.

Tbe statute of this State requires tbe juror to be an elector of tbe county for which be is summoned, and be cannot be an elector unless be is a resident.

Residence depends upon intention as well as fact, [176] and mere * inhabitancy for…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. SladkyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API