Legal Opinion

Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1910No. L.A. No. 2415PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles Lantz, Ernest E. Wood, and Walton J. Wood, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The J. W. Robinson Company was conducting a department store in a building situate on Broadway Street in the city of Los Angeles. During the year 1906 it commenced the construction of a second building to adjoin the rear of the one already occupied by it, with the purpose of connecting the two. The work was done under a contract with one Low, who agreed, for a commission on the cost of labor and materials, to supervise the construction and attend to the buying of materials and the hiring of labor necessary in the construction of said…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. FirstbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Thompson v. Cal. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Weisser v. Southern Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. MaerklCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  4. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API