Pollitz v. Wickersham
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Heller & Powers, Edmund Tauzsky, and A. A. Moore, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was one brought by plaintiffs, who were stockbrokers, to obtain a decree adjudging that the estate of Frederick A. Wickersham, deceased, is indebted to them in the sum of $33,514.55 with interest, for moneys advanced by them in the purchase for said Wicker-sham of five hundred shares of the stock of the Honokaa Sugar Company, a corporation, and five hundred shares of the stock of the Paauhau Sugar Plantation Company, a corporation, and directing the sale of said stock, together with three hundred and fifty other shares of the Plonokaa Company belonging to Wickersham, all of which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Weisser v. Southern Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.