Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County granting a new trial. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. A nonsuit was granted as to the defendant, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment against the E. B. & A. L. Stone Company. That company moved for a new trial which was granted and plaintiff appeals from that order.
The following facts are stated in the complaint, and at the trial there was evidence on the part of plaintiff tending to sustain them. The defendant, E. B. & A. L. Stone Company (hereafter to be referred to as the company), prior to and on August 11, 1903, was engaged in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Courtell v. McEachenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Shannon v. Central-Gaither Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.