Martel v. Meehan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The action was brought under the chapter of the Code of Civil Procedure which treats of summary proceedings for obtaining possession of real property.
The complaint alleges that on or about the 30th of May, 1879, plaintiff, by a written agreement and lease, leased, demised, and let to "William Meehan, now deceased, certain premises (described) in the city and county of San Francisco: “To have and to hold said premises to the said William Meehan, now deceased, at the monthly rent of two hundred dollars, payable monthly in advance on the 10th day of each and every month thereafter in advance, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reay v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by8 opinions
- Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. SladkyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Knowles v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Coe v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Stockton Morris Plan Co. v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.