Legal Opinion

Steinback v. Krone

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sprague, J. :

This is an action under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act of April 27th, 1863, for the recovery of the possession of certain premises alleged to be in possession of defendants under a lease from plaintiffs, and for the recovery of treble rents due under the lease, and for treble damages, for an alleged unlawful holding over by defendants in violation of their covenants in the lease.

The answer of defendants in effect admits the material allegations of the complaint, and alleges as a special defense matters which, if sustained by the evidence, constitute a bar to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. WarschauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Wheelock v. WarschauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. SladkyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Coe v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. More, Reynolds & Co. v. LottNevada Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API