Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Roberts

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1912No. L.A. No. 2546PublishedCited by 42 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendants. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand dollars. The defendants Lankershim and Biorci moved for a new trial, and the court below made an order granting their motion. From this order the plaintiff appeals.

The complaint alleges that the defendant Lankershim was erecting a building in the city of Los Angeles; that the defendants Biorci and Roberts Construction Company were employed by him in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McEwen v. Occidental Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API