Legal Opinion

Tarte v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 15, 2008No. 07-60762-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter came before the Court upon the ore tenus emergency motion of the United States of America to preclude Plaintiff Karen Tarte’s attorney or any other representatives or agents of Plaintiff from attending Plaintiffs Rule 35, Fed.R.Civ.P., medical examinations and to require Plaintiff to submit to x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and the taking of a medical history deemed by the government’s examining physicians to be necessary to conduct a meaningful Rule 35 examination of Plaintiff. The Court held a hearing on February 12,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  2. Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  3. Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  4. Tirado v. ErosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Abdulwali v. Washington Metro Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Calderon v. Reederei Claus-Peter Offen GmbH & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  3. Ren v. Phoenix Satellite Television (Us), Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Allison Aubuchon v. Tate Trucking, LLC, and Wendimu MitanoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
  5. Carol Melancon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API