Legal Opinion

Calderon v. Reederei Claus-Peter Offen GmbH & Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 27, 2009No. 07-61022-CIVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL RULE 35 EXAMINATION

BARRY S. SELTZER, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Reederei Claus-Peter Offen’s Motion to Compel Independent Medical Examination of Plaintiff (DE 62) and the Court being sufficiently advised, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as more fully set forth below.

Plaintiff brings this action under the Long-shore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. § 905(b), to recover for physical injuries allegedly sustained on July 23, 2004, while working as a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  3. Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  4. Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Brandenberg v. El Al Israel AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Ren v. Phoenix Satellite Television (Us), Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Smith v. CAFE ASIADistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. A.T. v. OLEY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Brewer v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API