Legal Opinion

Carol Melancon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided August 3, 2026No. 6:25-cv-01461Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION CAROL MELANCON CASE NO. 6:25-CV-01461 VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID J. AYO INSURANCE CO MEMORANDUM RULING AND ORDER Before the Court is a MOTION TO COMPEL ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OPINION [Doc. 17] filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Plaintiff Carol Melancon filed an opposition to the motion [Doc. 18], to which State Farm replied [Doc. 21]. For the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED, and State Farm is ORDERED to arrange and pay for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Teche Lines, Inc. v. BoyetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Favale v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  4. Moore v. Calavar Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1992
  5. Tarte v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API