Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Nacirema’s petition and plaintiff’s answer thereto raise the question whether plaintiff has the right to have his attorney present during a medical examination pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.1
*596' Plaintiff, a longshoreman, is suing the owner and operator of the S. S. Valiant Hope, alleging unseaworthiness and negligence. The complaint alleges that he sustained “severe painful and permanent injuries to his head, neck, back, body, arms and legs, the muscles, tendons, ligaments, aponeuroses, membranes, articular cartilages, joint capsules,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pitcairn v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Bowing v. Delaware Rayon Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- United States v. AnayaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- Lowe v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.