Pacific Paving Co. v. Verso
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
This action was brought to recover separate assessments against the several defendants, fifteen in number, on a street assessment for paving and curbing “the intersection of San Jose avenue, 28th and Guerrero streets,” in the city and county of San Francisco.
The court made findings, upon which judgment was ordered and entered in favor of each of the defendants. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and order.
The contract was entered into and all the preliminary proceedings taken under the act of 1885 (Stats. 1885, p. 147), commonly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Partridge v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ryan v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bay Rock Company v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- City of Charlotte v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Mapp v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Todd v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.