Ryan v. Altschul
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
On the eleventh day of June, 1888, the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco made and passed a resolution of intention, declaring their intention to order “redwood curbs, plank sidewalks, and rock gutters to be laid on the southerly side of Post street, commencing at the southwesterly corner of Broderick and Post streets, for a distance of 275 feet, and that the southerly one-half of the roadway opposite to the above-described portion of Post street be regraded and remacadamized.”
*175In regular course of the procedure thus inaugurated, the board ordered the work…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Partridge v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Parker v. ReayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Diggins v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Schumacker v. TobermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spaulding v. WessonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Benson v. BuntingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Perine v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.