Legal Opinion
O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 8724PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This action was brought to enjoin the defendants the City of Los Angeles and certain of its officers from expending any money in furtherance of a proceeding initiated under the Street Opening Act of 1903 (Stats. 1903, p. 376), including the cost of the prosecution of a pending action in condemnation. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled. The defendants stood on their demurrer and declined to answer, whereupon a judgment of injunction was entered as prayed. From this judgment the defendants appeal.
On January 22, 1923, the council of said city adopted an ordinance entitled: “An…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Michigan Trust Co. v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.