Labs v. Cooper
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento. The property sought to he charged with the line of the street assessment in this case was situated in the city of Sacramento. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of defendant in an action to foreclosure the lien of an assessment for street work.
The court found in favor of the plaintiff upon all his averments excepting that of the recordation of the diagram.
The diagram, as recorded, omitted the arrow and the initial letters N., E., S., and W., indicating the points *657of the compass. The court concluded that there was no sufficient description of the property contained in the recorded assessment and diagram and passed judgment accordingly.
The arguments here urged in support of the sufficiency of the diagram were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Whiting v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Williams v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Williams v. Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Norton v. CourtneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Albert v. SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Eastman v. GurreyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.