Legal Opinion

Hom v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1963No. Docket Nos. 20557, 20558PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Paul H. Ong and Roger Hom, after a jury verdict in consolidated personal injury actions arising out of an automobile-pedestrian accident.

Facts

The facts connected with the happening of the accident are essentially as follows: Plaintiffs were crossing Broadway at its intersection with Grant Avenue in San Francisco in the early morning of February 23, 1958, when they were struck by an automobile driven by defendant. Plaintiffs had spent the evening of the accident in Chinatown celebrating the Chinese New Year. Both plaintiffs…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Manuel L. Kiner v. Lyla Lee NorthcuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API