Legal Opinion
Todd v. City of Visalia
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1967No. Civ. 755PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The plaintiff and appellant, F. Bartell Todd, a property owner in the proposed Visalia improvement district which was sought to be organized under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Sts. & Hy. Code, div. 12), attempted by this proceeding in administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proe., § 1094.5) to restrain the formation and operation of the district. The trial court denied mandate and held that the improvement district in the center of the city, where it was proposed to install some 10 public parking lots and to accomplish street paving and improvement, including a mall, was properly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Da Roza v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Downtown Palo Alto Committee for Fair Assessment v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Savoy Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hauser v. Ventura Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Marlow v. Orange County Human Services AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.