Legal Opinion
In Re Jones
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1987No. 87-252PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
In May 1986 Bar Counsel filed with the Board on Professional Responsibility a two-count petition against respondent Jones. The first count alleged that she had violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 6-101(A)(3) by neglecting a legal matter1 and DR 1-102(A)(5) by failing to respond to the legitimate inquiries of Bar Counsel.2 The second count alleged an additional violation of DR 1-102(A)(5), again by failing to respond to the legitimate inquiries of Bar Counsel. In accordance with D.C.Bar R. XI, § 7(2), a *337hearing committee of the Board held an evidentiary hearing. Jones, however, did not attend that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re DelateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re DruryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.