Legal Opinion
Matter of Smith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1979No. DP-33-77/S-57-79PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
Following investigations and hearings, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that Conrad P. Smith (respondent), a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, had violated several provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, see D.C.App.R. X, in two separate cases. Pursuant to D.C. App.R. XI, Sec. 7(3), the Board has submitted to this court its recommendations that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for eighteen months and that he be required to make restitution of $280 to Georgia Scales, one of the complainants. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Matter of DwyerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Committee on Professional Ethics and Grievances of the Virgin Islands Bar Association v. Russell B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.