Legal Opinion
In Re Delate
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 6, 1990No. 90-14PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This disciplinary proceeding concerns respondent’s alleged misconduct as a conservator in two separate cases. In the first ease, the Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent had neglected a legal matter entrusted to her, DR 6-101(A)(3), engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, DR 1-102(A)(5), and failed to deliver files and assets to a client’s duly authorized representative, DR 9-103(B)(4). In the second case, the Board concluded, once again, that respondent had neglected a legal matter entrusted to her and engaged in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SiegelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re StarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.