Legal Opinion
In Re Drury
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1996No. 96-BG-156PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
This matter, involving reciprocal discipline, is before us for the second time. Our first opinion is set forth in In re Drury, 638 A.2d 60 (D.C.1994) (Drury I). There we considered whether “the Board [on Professional Responsibility] may recommend an increased sanction as well as identical discipline or a lesser sanction” in a reciprocal discipline case. Id. at 63. Because we concluded that the Board could recommend an increased sanction, we remanded the case to the Board so that the respondent could have a “re*466newed opportunity” to address the sanction issue. Id.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re KitchingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re ZakroffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.