Legal Opinion
In Re Hines
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1984No. M-141-82PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Per curiam
This case comes before the court on the report of the Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR) recommending that respondent, a member of the bar, be suspended from the practice of law. A hearing committee of the BPR found that respondent had violated certain disciplinary rules in two separate cases. In one case, Bar Docket No. 447-79 (the Nusbaum case), the committee found that respondent had violated Disciplinary Rules 9-103(A), 1 1-102(A)(4), 2 9-103(B)(4), 3 and 7-101(A){3). 4 The BPR adopted the committee’s findings. In the other case, Bar Docket No. 194-80 (the Shakkour case), the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.