Legal Opinion
In Re Wright
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 1997No. 97-BG-623PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent Wright, a member of our bar, be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, and that he be required to demonstrate his fitness to practice law and to make restitution of $2,000 to a former client, with interest, before being reinstated. The Board found that Mr. Wright had violated several of the Rules of Professional Conduct, following a hearing at which Mr. Wright failed to appear. A copy of the Board’s report is appended to this opinion.
Mr. Wright has not challenged the Board’s recommendation in any respect. He…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.