Legal Opinion
In Re Rosen
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 1984No. 83-1288PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge, Retired:
In this disciplinary matter, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for three months for making misrepresentations to the court on three separate occasions. Respondent contends that in arriving at this recommendation, the Board failed to consider findings of fact made by the Hearing Committee that weighed in favor of a less severe sanction. Respondent also argues that the recommended sanction is more severe than the punishments imposed by the Board and this court for similar conduct in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- District of Columbia Bar v. KleindienstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of SheehyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.