Legal Opinion

Matter of Greenspan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1990No. 90-242PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was charged with engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of DR 1-102(A)(5). Specifically, respondent was charged with failing to attend meetings and to supply information to the Superior Court Auditor-Master, and failure to respond to Bar Counsel’s inquiries regarding these failures.

At the same time respondent was facing these charges, he was given a six-month suspension by the Maryland Court of Appeals for making false statements to a bank on behalf of a client. Upon the recommendation of the Board, we administered reciprocal discipline nunc…

2Cases cited4 opinions

In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
In Re E. David HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
In Re MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
In Re JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
In Re JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
Matter of JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
In Re HerndonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.