Legal Opinion

William Pitt, Inc. v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1982PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is an action to recover a real estate commission in accordance with the terms of a listing agreement between the plaintiff, William Pitt, Inc., a broker, 1 and the defendants, Charles G-. Taylor and Helen T. Taylor, the owners of certain real estate in Stamford. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court granted. The plaintiffs have appealed.

The trial court’s memorandum of decision and the record reveal the following facts. The parties signed a listing contract on September 28, 1977, in which the named plaintiff agreed to procure a buyer for real property at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Thornton Real Estate, Inc. v. LobdellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Rusco Industries, Inc. v. Hartford Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Hossan v. HudiakoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Location Realty, Inc. v. ColaccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API