Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Turlick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 22, 1972PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

In this action, brought for a real estate broker’s commission, the court rendered judgment for the plaintiffs and the defendants have appealed.

The defendants assign error in the refusal by the court to include in its finding eight paragraphs of the draft finding which they claim are undisputed. To secure the addition of a fact on this ground the defendants must refer in their brief to some part of the ¡appendix, the pleadings or an exhibit properly before us which discloses that the plaintiffs admitted the truth of the fact or that its validity was conceded to be undisputed. Stoner v. Stoner,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API