Legal Opinion

Storm Associates, Inc. v. Baumgold

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 9, 1982PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the plaintiff, Storm Associates, Inc., has earned its commission under an exclusive real estate listing contract with the defendant, Norma Baum-gold. The plaintiff, alleging that it had found buyers ready, willing, and able to purchase the listed property in Redding, sued to recover its commission and an attorney’s fee. The defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim alleging misrepresenta tion in the plaintiff’s valuation of the premises. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff on its complaint and on the defendant’s counterclaim but…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Westar Energy, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Markey v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API