Legal Opinion
Griswold v. Union Labor Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 23, 1982PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiffs have sued on a group health insurance policy issued by the defendant, Union Labor Life Insurance Co., to the Trustees of Local 443 Transportation Health Services and Insurance Plan. The plaintiffs are husband and wife with Sally Griswold an insured dependent under her husband’s policy.
On March 5, 1977, Sally Griswold was injured in a one-car accident and, as a result, incurred certain medical and hospital expenses totaling under $5000. At the time of the accident, the plaintiffs maintained no insurance policy or acceptable substitute1 on their automobile which would provide…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.