Legal Opinion

Hossan v. Hudiakoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 17, 1979PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action to recover a real estate commission, the plaintiffs have appealed from the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion on the ground that the listing agreement between the parties did not contain the address or addresses of the plaintiffs as required by General Statutes § 20-325a (b).

Practice Book, 1978, § 384 provides that the rendition of summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Akin v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Redmond v. MatthiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API