Legal Opinion
McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. Berman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 7, 1991No. 14113; 14114PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
These two appeals arise from an action to recover a real estate commission. The defendants appeal from the denial of their motion to dissolve a prejudgment attachment of real estate, while the plaintiff appeals from the granting of the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The principal issue in both appeals is whether a real estate listing agreement satisfied the requirements of General Statutes § 20-325a (b).1 We conclude that those requirements were not satisfied.
The material facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff, McCutcheon and Burr, Inc., is a licensed real estate broker. On or about October…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Egri v. FoisieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Anderson v. SchiefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.