Legal Opinion
Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. Weiner
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 10, 1989No. 6082PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff, Rostenberg-Doern Company, Inc., initiated this action to recover a real estate commission in connection with the rental of commercial property owned by the defendants, Alan and Keith Weiner. After the pleadings were closed, the case was referred to an attorney trial referee pursuant to General Statutes § 52-434 (a) (4).1 Following a hearing, the trial referee issued a report that included his recommendation that judgment be rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court accepted the trial referee’s findings of fact, but rejected his conclusions of law and rendered judgment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Elgar v. ElgarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Wilcox Trucking, Inc. v. Mansour Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.