Legal Opinion

Barber v. California Employment Stabilization Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1954No. Civ. 16035; Civ. 16036PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

In these two cases, each involving a group of claimants, the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board denied unemployment benefits to the respective petitioners. Both groups sought a review of these determinations by writs of mandate in the superior court pursuant to the provisions of section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. These petitions were denied. Petitioners appeal. The two proceedings have been consolidated for the purpose of appeal.

In the Barber action all appellants are members of the National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards, while in the Crouse action all appellants are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Chance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Fanucchi v. Coberly-West Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Gardner v. Director of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API