Legal Opinion
Parker v. Bowron
California Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1953No. L. A. 22294PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*347EDMONDS, J.
The purpose of this mandate proceeding is to compel the respondent city officials to fix a salary or wage for all of the city’s employees in certain classifications at least equal to the prevailing scale for similar employment in private industry. The appeal from the judgment of dismissal primarily presents for decision the question as to whether the proceeding is brought by a person or persons having the requisite beneficial interest.
According to the caption of the petition, the relief is sought by “Lester A. Parker, individually and as a member of, and Secretary Treasurer of, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.