Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment Commission
California Supreme Court
Robert W. Kenny and Morris E. Cohn for Co-respondents. Milton Marks, as Amicus Curiae, on behalf of Respondents. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, as Amici Curiae, on behalf of Petitioners.
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus in the District Court of Appeal, Third District, to compel the respondent Commission to set aside its decision awarding unemployment compensation to two of the co-respondents, to compel it to deny such compensation to the other co-respondents, and to compel it to correct petitioner’s merit rating under the Unemployment Insurance Act. (Stats. 1935, chap. 352, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1939 Supp., Act 8780d.) The writ issued as prayed. Thereafter a petition by respondents and co-respondents for hearing in this court was granted.
There is no conflict as…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by273 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
268 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.